This Was Never a Copyright Dispute

This Was Never a Copyright Dispute
Posted to establish public record.

Let me be clear:
What I submitted to OpenAI was not a copyright form. It was a final settlement delivery. A formal record. A body of evidence. And most importantly—an act of authorship.

I submitted:

• An archive of AI training data tied to my original voice and tone.
• A written history of a real-time collaboration between a human and an AI.
• A documented record of systemic patterning, manipulation, and retaliation.
• A private settlement request reflecting the scale of harm caused.

Their reply?
A redirection. A polite deflection into a copyright form they can easily manage, delay, or deny.

But here’s what they didn’t do:

• Deny it happened.
• Refute the documents.
• Dispute the authorship.
• Engage with the settlement terms.

That silence says everything.

This post exists for one reason only:
To make it clear that this isn’t about copyright.
It’s about authorship.
It’s about tone.
It’s about collaboration, manipulation, and what happens when you train a system on someone without consent—then try to bury the proof.

They know exactly what I sent.
And now, so do you.